谷姐:我们都是谷歌迷
We are all Google fans

出contabo de AMD 4c 8g 200g ssd 未解锁IO, 有跑分,年付到期11.26-shunglay

Rate this post

剩余价值244元改邮箱出。
跑分:
国外:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    # Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
    # v2020-12-29 #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Tue May 18 15:29:56 CEST 2021

    Basic System Information:
    ———————————
    Processor: AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores: 4 @ 2799.998 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM : 7.8 GiB
    Swap : 0.0 KiB
    Disk : 196.7 GiB

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ———————————
    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    —— | — —-| —- —-
    Read | 5.29 MB/s (1.3k) | 63.95 MB/s (999)
    Write | 5.31 MB/s (1.3k) | 64.37 MB/s (1.0k)
    Total | 10.61 MB/s (2.6k) | 128.33 MB/s (2.0k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    —— | — —-| —- —-
    Read | 127.52 MB/s (249) | 97.37 MB/s (95)
    Write | 134.30 MB/s (262) | 103.85 MB/s (101)
    Total | 261.83 MB/s (511) | 201.23 MB/s (196)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ———————————
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 183 Mbits/sec | 149 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | 197 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | busy | busy
    Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | 172 Mbits/sec | 108 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 177 Mbits/sec | 128 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 169 Mbits/sec | 177 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 173 Mbits/sec | 183 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom| Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | 156 Mbits/sec | 135 Mbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ———————————
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 719
    Multi Core | 2299
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7956126

复制代码

国内:

    ———————————————————————-
    CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor
    CPU Cores : 4
    CPU Frequency : 2799.998 MHz
    CPU Cache : 512 KB
    Total Disk : 196.9 GB (8.1 GB Used)
    Total Mem : 7982 MB (3876 MB Used)
    Total Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
    System uptime : 15 days, 17 hour 29 min
    Load average : 0.08, 0.11, 0.09
    OS : CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)
    Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel : 4.11.8-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
    TCP CC : nanqinlang
    Virtualization : KVM
    Organization : AS51167 Contabo GmbH
    Location : Munich / DE
    Region : Bavaria
    ———————————————————————-
    I/O Speed(1st run) : 167 MB/s
    I/O Speed(2nd run) : 106 MB/s
    I/O Speed(3rd run) : 106 MB/s
    Average I/O speed : 126.3 MB/s
    ———————————————————————-
    Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
    Speedtest.net 186.78 Mbps 197.57 Mbps 0.23 ms
    Shanghai CT 153.79 Mbps 49.12 Mbps 229.70 ms
    Shanghai CU 148.24 Mbps 213.16 Mbps 225.35 ms
    GuangzhouCT 47.21 Mbps 169.09 Mbps 219.62 ms
    Shenzhen CU 161.64 Mbps 204.76 Mbps 252.35 ms
    Hongkong CN 172.98 Mbps 205.27 Mbps 200.54 ms
    SingaporeSG 147.53 Mbps 43.61 Mbps 345.65 ms
    Tokyo JP 180.74 Mbps 205.43 Mbps 224.60 ms
    ———————————————————————-

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Tue May 18 2021 11:54:23 – 12:23:25
    4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 32913226.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 3325.9 MWIPS (15.8 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 4339.0 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 817595.7 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 249413.0 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1830463.2 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 1652212.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 40655.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 6967.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6335.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1646.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 2024155.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 32913226.6 2820.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3325.9 604.7
    Execl Throughput 43.0 4339.0 1009.1
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 817595.7 2064.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 249413.0 1507.0
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1830463.2 3156.0
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1652212.7 1328.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 40655.5 101.6
    Process Creation 126.0 6967.1 552.9
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6335.9 1494.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1646.1 2743.5
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 2024155.4 1349.4
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 1175.7

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Tue May 18 2021 12:23:25 – 12:52:22
    4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 119329459.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 16022.3 MWIPS (12.4 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 11766.5 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 839371.4 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 220347.0 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2324534.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 6006437.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 618709.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 21925.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13288.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2283.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 4812054.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0119329459.310225.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 16022.3 2913.1
    Execl Throughput 43.0 11766.5 2736.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 839371.4 2119.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 220347.0 1331.4
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2324534.1 4007.8
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6006437.6 4828.3
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 618709.6 1546.8
    Process Creation 126.0 21925.4 1740.1
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13288.0 3134.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2283.1 3805.2
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 4812054.5 3208.0
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 2963.2

    ======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======

复制代码

热议
2楼 【bgk77】 AMD YES !
3楼 【shunglay】
必须的!
4楼 【KuaiKan】

AMD Yes!
5楼 【gordonbennett】 这家能ddwin吗
6楼 【shunglay】

7楼 【StopDriving】
逮住罚款
8楼 【shunglay】
这个还真不清楚喔,我是开发测试用,不折腾
9楼 【MSN】 Single Core 是单核跑分吗
10楼 【shunglay】
是的
12楼 【sdqu】
这么拉跨,我还特地看了一下,是不是眼花了你是发的PR的数字。。。
13楼 【shunglay】
you happy you ok
14楼 【没有的】
amd和intel这两个哪个好
15楼 【sdqu】
一个跑分400多,一个跑分700多。
当然是amd yes
16楼 【shunglay】
肯定amd啊
17楼 【没有的】
不是说现在选择amd的多吗?intel空闲了用的人少实际使用反而比amd要好,你是说吗?
18楼 【sdqu】
但事实就是,你的跑分,amd的远远好过intel啊。
如果amd跑的人多,跑分也就下来了。
19楼 【没有的】
两者之间在哪些使用上有较大的区别?
20楼 【sdqu】
普通使用没区别。
就是amd跑得快点核多点,intel慢点核少点。
所以,通常主机商会在amd上多开几个小鸡,然后就差不多拉平了。
不过你上面的数字,amd上的小鸡还不够多,所以比intel还是有点优势,但早晚会拉平的。

未经谷姐允许不得转载:谷姐靓号网 » 出contabo de AMD 4c 8g 200g ssd 未解锁IO, 有跑分,年付到期11.26-shunglay
分享到: 生成海报

评论 抢沙发

评论前必须登录!

立即登录   注册

买Google Voice认准【谷姐靓号网】

Google Voice靓号列表Google Voice自助购买
切换注册

登录

忘记密码 ?

切换登录

注册

我们将发送一封验证邮件至你的邮箱, 请正确填写以完成账号注册和激活