因为字数限制原因不能全发，完整测试直接跑去我博客看：https://pjidc.cyou/?p=416
SuperBench
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html
Mode: [0;32mStandard[0m Version : [0;32m1.1.7
Usage : wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 [url=home.php?mod=space&uid=175]@[/url] 2.00GHz
CPU Cores : 1 Cores 1999.997 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 10 (64 Bit) KVM
Kernel : 4.19.0-13-amd64
Total Space : 1.2 GB / 9.8 GB
Total RAM : 55 MB / 987 MB (281 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 0 MB / 0 MB
Uptime : 0 days 0 hour 19 min
Load Average : 0.16, 0.06, 0.02
TCP CC : cubic
ASN & ISP : AS46573, LayerHost
Organization : Root Networks LLC
Location : Los Angeles, United States / US
Region : California
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 250 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 218 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 333 MB/s
Average I/O Speed : 267.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 80.44 Mbit/s 94.77 Mbit/s (*)191.25 ms
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 94.4 Mbit/s -
Nanjing 5G CT98.17 Mbit/s 97.22 Mbit/s 173.00 ms
Hefei 5G CT92.11 Mbit/s 97.41 Mbit/s 155.03 ms
Guangzhou 5G CT14.37 Mbit/s 81.62 Mbit/s 181.08 ms
Shanghai 5GCU97.19 Mbit/s 102.53 Mbit/s 131.00 ms
Wuxi 5G CM94.62 Mbit/s 95.06 Mbit/s 169.79 ms
Nanjing 5G CM20.71 Mbit/s 89.70 Mbit/s 172.78 ms
Hefei 5G CM96.03 Mbit/s 99.65 Mbit/s 158.33 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in: 5 min 44 sec
Timestamp :GMT+8
Results : ./superbench.log
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Share result:
· https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/588d8e1a-2205-4f0e-b552-46117ddd22da
· https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/v84pvpZ65q/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
YABS
- # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
# Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
# v2022-02-18 #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
Sat 05 Mar 2022 02:45:48 AM UTC
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
CPU cores: 1 @ 1999.997 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 987.2 MiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 9.8 GiB
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ----| ---- ----
Read | 67.44 MB/s (16.8k) | 135.67 MB/s (2.1k)
Write | 67.61 MB/s (16.9k) | 136.38 MB/s (2.1k)
Total | 135.06 MB/s(33.7k) | 272.05 MB/s (4.2k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ----| ---- ----
Read | 137.67 MB/s (268) | 142.51 MB/s (139)
Write | 144.99 MB/s (283) | 152.00 MB/s (148)
Total | 282.67 MB/s (551) | 294.52 MB/s (287)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 16.7 Mbits/sec| 19.8 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 65.1 Mbits/sec| 81.6 Mbits/sec
WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 74.3 Mbits/sec| busy
WebHorizon | Singapore (400M) | 85.1 Mbits/sec| 88.7 Mbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 79.7 Mbits/sec| 85.4 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 77.5 Mbits/sec| 87.0 Mbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 91.2 Mbits/sec| 28.1 Mbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom| Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | 75.5 Mbits/sec| 73.6 Mbits/sec
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 394
Multi Core | 369
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/13185387
UnixBench
- ========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: w3d-host-wMixE5cX: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.19.0-13-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.19.160-2 (2020-11-28)
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
02:59:54 up 43 min,4 users,load average: 0.77, 0.60, 0.38; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 05 2022 02:59:54 - 03:28:28
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22041243.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3478.9 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2194.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 313751.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 84724.7 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 831405.6 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 453493.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 95091.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5002.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4445.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 573.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 269313.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22041243.5 1888.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3478.9 632.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 2194.9 510.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313751.1 792.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 84724.7 511.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 831405.6 1433.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 453493.0 364.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 95091.9 237.7
Process Creation 126.0 5002.5 397.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4445.9 1048.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 573.7 956.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 269313.3 179.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 600.4
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
AFF MAN链接
含AFF：https://www.w3d-usa.com/aff.php?aff=13
不含AFF：https://www.w3d-usa.com/
热议
2楼 hacker-x 3小时前
价格和配置较deepvm差的有点儿远
3楼 crystalstudio 3小时前
价格和配置较deepvm差的有点儿远
DeepVM的9929我记得是Kurun家的，貌似去程不是9929，这款去程是直连9929
4楼 cmfv 2小时前
重点是回程 三网回层9929吗
6楼 烟雨a 2小时前
有点烂
7楼 tg-iam 半小时前
看能坚持多久
8楼 MMMM 半小时前
三网回程9929联通电信去程9929。年付5刀还行。
9楼 crystalstudio 8分钟前
三网回程9929联通电信去程9929。年付5刀还行。
我感觉挺香的
10楼 不要说话 5分钟前
年付5刀的性价比真高，但是没有了，看看老板能坚持多久吧，现在的同价位的还是又很多可挑选的
申明：本文内容由网友收集分享，仅供学习参考使用。如文中内容侵犯到您的利益，请在文章下方留言，本站会第一时间进行处理。